
For the last two-dimensional experiment, the problem is now acting
two different two-variable polynomials. The input data has a jumped discontinuous
property at the junction. We consider the following problem
Using the same technique of finding the exact solution as the previous
experiment and the integration by parts, the coefficient of
can be determined as follows
Therefore, the exact solution for the problem (2.3.1) is
Again, we used the five-point difference method to solve the numerical
solutions and setting the function value at the junctions to be the average
of the function values neighbouring nodal points. Table 8.1
and Table 8.2 show the numerical solutions
at the nodal point (1/4, 1/4) with zero at the junctions and Table 8.3
and Table 8.4 show the numerical solutions
at the same point with the average at the junctions. And it is obvious
that the numerical results strongly agreed with the results of the Experiment
(2.2). We also obtain the same asymptotic
error expansion with order
when we set the average at the junctions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| h=1/4 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/8 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/16 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/32 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/64 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/128 |
|
|
||
| h=1/256 |
|
|
r(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(5)
|
|
|
||
|
r(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| h=1/4 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/8 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/16 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/32 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/64 |
|
|
|
|
| h=1/128 |
|
|
||
| h=1/256 |
|
|
r(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r(4)
|
|
|
||
|
r(5)
|
|
|
||
|
r(6)
|
|